A college professor stood before his Philosophy 201 class and had some items in front of him.

When the class began, he wordlessly picked up a very large and empty mayonnaise jar and proceeded to fill it with golf balls.
He then asked the students if the jar was full.

They agreed that it was.

The professor then picked up a box of pebbles and poured them into the jar He shook the jar lightly..
The pebbles rolled into the open areas between the golf balls.
He then asked the students again if the jar was full.

They agreed it was.

The professor next picked up a box of sand and poured it into the jar.
Of course, the sand filled up everything else.
He asked once more if the jar was full.

The students responded with a unanimous ‘yes.’

The professor then produced two Beers from under the table and poured the entire contents into the jar effectively filling the empty space between the sand.
The students laughed.

‘Now,’ said the professor as the laughter subsided, ‘I want you to recognize that this jar represents your life.

The golf balls are the important things—your family, your children, your health, your friends and your favorite passions—and if everything else was lost and only they remained, your life would still be full.

The pebbles are the other things that matter like your job, your house and your car.

The sand is everything else—the small stuff.
‘If you put the sand into the jar first,’ he continued, ‘there is no room for the pebbles or golf balls.
The same goes for life.

If you spend all your time and energy on the small stuff you will never have room for the things that are important to you.

Pay attention to the things that are critical to your happiness.
Spend time with your children.
Spend time with your parents.
Visit with grandparents.
Take time to get medical checkups.
Take your spouse out to dinner.
Practice “romance” as often as possible.
There will always be time to clean the house and fix the disposal.
Take care of “Mama” first—the things that really matter.
Set your priorities.
The rest is just sand.

One of the students raised her hand and inquired what the Beer represented.
The professor smiled and said, ‘I’m glad you asked.’

The Beer just shows you that no matter how full your life may seem, there’s always room for a couple of Beers with a friend.

[Source Unknown]

Google has developed software to help autistic children develop life skills. Although no two autistic children are the same, they all exhibit general obsessive-compulsive behaviors and language deficiencies. At the same time, however, these children often exhibit extraordinary computer gaming skills.

Google’s Project Spectrum has created Google SketchUp 3D modeling software to give people with autism the opportunity to express their creativity and develop a life skill. It is not a traditional video game as we think of such games, but is a creative tool for the child to design 3D environments.

“The idea for Project Spectrum originated when we began getting phone calls and emails from users telling us about how much kids on the autism spectrum were enjoying SketchUp,” Google tells educators. “As the calls kept coming in, we learned that people with autism tend to be visually and spatially gifted — that, in fact, they think in pictures. When people with these gifts get their hands on powerful, easy-to-use 3D design software like SketchUp, sparks tend to fly.”

The link for more information and a free download is http://sketchup.google.com/spectrum.html

Former Vice President Dick Cheney is an angry man. Why, you ask? Well, Cheney was one of the chief promoters of the Iraq occupation and the policy of torturing “enemy combatants.” He is angry because President Obama may allow the creation of a “truth commission” — headed by a special law prosecutor — to determine if federal laws were broken and what punishment, if any, should be handed down. Cheney angrily refers to this process as a political “witch-hunt.” Cheney is attempting to turn the process from an independent, nonpartisan criminal investigation into an act of political retribution by Democrats against Republicans. He is attempting to ward off or stall any possible investigation of himself and others in the Bush administration. I can almost hear the paper shredders now….

Hardcore free-market Republicans often rail against “big government,” so let’s take a few minutes to figure out what the role of government should be in the United States.

What do we want from the federal government? What do we, as citizens, expect our government to be? What services do we want it to provide on our behalf?

The first thing about government is that we all want it to work for us, not against us. We do not want to be taxed excessively and we do not want to be spied upon like “big brother.” We want our elected officials to serve us honorably and we want our justice system to be fair and equal. I would venture to guess that few Americans would argue with these general points, no matter what their political beliefs.

Now, forget government for a minute. What do American citizens want America to be? Do we want the best health care and education in the world? Do we want retired citizens to have a guaranteed income? Do we want the strongest military in the world? Do we want clean energy? Do we want to do our part to end global warming? Do we want strong bridges? Do we want clean drinking water systems and good sewer systems? Do we want clean air to breathe? Do we want corporations to be able to do whatever they want without accountability or do we want them strictly regulated? Do we want corporations to have the same constitutional rights as individuals? Do we want a safe interstate system without potholes and other hazards? Do we want high-speed rail? Do we want safe food? Do we want equal rights for all, including the right to same-sex marriage? Do we want a minimum wage? Do we want a living wage? Do we want an unregulated mass media, with as few as five conglomerates controlling more than 50 percent of the news we get? Do we want more licenses for low-power radio and television stations? Do we want to permit torture techniques to be used on foreign prisoners? Do we want affordable housing? Do we want to ensure that the unemployed have an income until they find work? Do we want to bailout failing banks and large corporations?

Obviously, this list could go on and on and on, but for our purposes, we will end it here. These questions, when used to decide what role government should play, are where people part ways as Americans and become political opponents. There are those who look at a budget and scream “Pork!” when they see proposals for more unemployment insurance, a raise in the minimum wage, money to repair bridges on secondary highways, housing for the poor, more schools, local water projects, repair of inner city sewer systems, and so forth. Some people believe that the federal government should not be spending money for such things, yet they invariably support unlimited spending for war and preparations for war.

The problem with spending in general is, if we want something, someone has to pay for it. No one these days wants to take responsibility for increasing taxes, so the burden is passed on from the federal government to individual states, counties, cities, towns and villages. Revenue is created by increasing various kinds of taxes — like fuel taxes, hotel taxes, income taxes, sales taxes, property taxes, estate taxes, “sin” taxes, and so forth. People who call for no tax increases and limited federal government mean that they do not want to say they support taxes at the federal level. They are not putting the needs of America first, but are playing party politics. They are trying to win House and Senate seats by claiming that they support limited government and no tax increases, but these shady politicians know full well that there will be new taxes at the state and/or the municipal level. Otherwise, the United States would fall apart at the seams. Oh wait, it already is!

It is largely the Republicans who want to be known as the party that believes in limited federal spending and the Democrats who believe the federal government has a responsibility to spend money for things that most Americans want and need. Republicans want to give tax breaks to the rich and super-rich and Democrats want this exclusive group to pay more federal taxes, largely by plugging the loopholes that allow the rich to maintain overseas addresses in order to escape the responsibility of paying federal taxes at all.

The thing that all Americans who have been hoodwinked into narrow thinking by blowhards like Rush Limbaugh and Bill O’Reilly need to be aware of is that taxation is a responsibility of civil society. If we want Social Security to be viable — and it still is viable right now — then we need to pay into the system and perhaps even increase the amount of federal withholding for Social Security. Those who call for privatization — letting people choose to invest in the stock market instead of Social Security — would ruin one of the best federal programs ever created. The needs of the majority of Americans outweigh the needs of a few rich bankers who would get even richer from privatization. At some point we have to say “the needs of the many outweigh the needs of the few.” And we say NO to privatization.

That said, we also must be responsible in the way our taxes are used. No question about it. We have to prioritize and plan. We have to save for projects that may not even be completed in our lifetime. For example, America’s infrastructure is old and in need of an upgrade. Many inner city and rural water and sewer systems, subways, bridges, roadways, housing projects, and railroads need replaced as soon as possible. These are long-term projects that may take 50 years or more to complete! Obviously, completing them is in the best interest of every single American, but are a nightmare for selfish politicians who want votes now and do not want to plan for the future or allocate funds for projects that may not be completed while the politician is still alive. America is slowly crumbling away and will continue to do so until citizens find the spine to think collectively and put all politicians on notice that the real needs of America and Americans must come first.

Now, I ask again, what do we want from our federal government? What do we want government to provide on our behalf? Does anyone not see how important the federal government is in our lives? We joke about it all the time — taxes to study the mating habits of the South American swamp rat, for example — but it all comes back to needs and priorities. No one wants to pay taxes for useless things and the working class are already taxed to the maximum, so the corporate rich and super-rich need to pay a greater share for the greater overall benefit of society. It is not the size of the federal government that matters, even if the federal government becomes the top employer in the nation and provides new public works jobs to tens of millions. What matters is that OUR federal government serve WE THE PEOPLE. That OUR federal government meets OUR needs — not the short-term, selfish needs of politicians, political parties, war profiteers, and unscrupulous media commentators.

The Obama administration did the right thing in releasing the “torture memos” from the Bush administration and they should be applauded for it. However, the Department of Justice failed to call for an independent special prosecutor to investigate the memos. Learning the truth is one thing, but failing to hold individuals responsible for wrong-doing is quite another matter. How do we justify letting public officials off the hook for possible crimes when common citizens are expected to either follow the “rule of law” or risk going to prison. Public officials should not be above the law or given immunity for crimes. In the coming days and weeks, we will learn more about these torture memos and how public officials violated the Geneva Conventions and International Law.

OK, Mr. Obama, you have my heartfelt congratulations! A Chicago grassroots organizer is now president of the United States. That is a major accomplishment in and of itself. It is early in your presidency and I am pleased that you have dealt with some of the worst offenses of the Bush administration through executive orders, but I must say that your larger policies concern me greatly. GREATLY.

First, there is the matter of privacy vs. warrantless wiretapping and electronic spying on Americans. Your Department of Justice, Mr. President, not only supports but goes beyond the Bush administration in preventing government accountability for willful violations of the law regarding COINTELPRO-style electronic eavesdropping. Your DOJ recently argued that the U.S. possesses “sovereign immunity” from misconduct lawsuits. Yet you pledged government accountability during the campaign. Strike one.

Then there is the matter of giving away billions of dollars in taxpayer funds to the same capitalist bankers that helped loot the public treasury in the first place. They must be laughing all the way out of the bank while our money goes to offshore accounts just as fast as they get their grubby hands on it. I got news for you: giving money to the banks is not going to stop the coming depression.

It seems to me that someone with ties to the Chicago grassroots community would bail out the unemployed and working poor first so that people do not lose their homes to the Wall Street thieves; to make sure that everyone has adequate food and access to health care whether they have a job with benefits or not. As you know, companies are laying off employees, eliminating health benefits, cutting back on retirement, and reducing hours in order to save money. What are people supposed to do? Starve? Turn to crime? Strike two.

Now I hear that you are asking Congress for more than $83 billion for continuing the Bush wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. I remember very clearly what you said during the campaign and I even made a ringtone out of it so everyone I am around is reminded as well: “When I am elected president I am going to end this war in Iraq and bring our troops home.” (Crowd cheers.) $83 billion will bring the total amount of money wasted on war up to $1 trillion.

One Trillion Dollars. That is One Thousand Billion Dollars! Or One Million Million Dollars! And there is no end in sight because you cannot fight a cowardly hit-and-run tactic like terrorism no matter how many people you kill and no matter how much money you spend in trying. Of course, the money enriches the military contractors who constantly lobby for more money. But the American people suffer; the Iraqi people suffer; and the Afghani people suffer. Osama bin Laden could have been captured years ago if Bush would have asked for the world’s help rather than insisting that the United States did not need help — and then talking crazy about smoking evil-doers out of their holes. Bush was like a bad cartoon.

One Thousand Billion Dollars wasted while states scramble to find money to pay state employees, pay unemployment benefits, and pay for educating our children while teachers have to meet the unfunded burden of No Child Left Behind. States like Ohio are even looking at gambling to bring us out of of debt, as if the Wall Street gamblers have not done enough damage. Now the rich and super-rich casino operators will be holding us by the ankles and shaking us to make sure they get all of our money.

Casinos to pay for educating our children? What kind of craziness is this? Does this make sense to a Chicago grassroots organizer? Is this the way the United States should be operating? Isn’t there a more fair and equitable — indeed, a more reasonable — economic system that we could work toward? Shouldn’t we be making 5, 10, and 20-year plans in order to ensure that human beings are able to have a job, decent housing, health, dental and eye care, safe food, and clean air and drinking water? What has happened to our priorities in a nation that espouses freedom and democracy, yet leaves its citizens’ dreams at the mercy of the market?

Socialism may seem like a dirty word to the Wall Street bankers, casino operators, military contractors, FOX News anchors, and other assorted con men and thieves who now thrive in the every-man-for-himself jungle of international capitalism. But a nation can have both personal freedom and genuine democracy and take care of citizen needs. It’s not that hard. You nationalize the banks, utilities, oil companies, health care conglomerates and other major industries then run them in the public interest, not for private profit. You eliminate the profit-taking at the top and reinvest at the bottom. Imagine a wellness-based single payer health care system free of insurance tycoons who now have the audacity to step in and change a doctor’s orders because it would interfere with their profits? No more of that nonsense.

This does not mean that the United States become the Soviet Union. No one wants that. We make our own brand of socialism based upon our long-held belief in liberty and justice for all. We do not restrict personal freedom; we expand it. We welcome those immigrants now living and working in our nation by giving them the opportunity for citizenship. We pay everyone a living wage, provide expanded Medicare for all citizens, make sure that schools are fully funded, and we invest in green technologies to provide millions of jobs and get away from fossil fuels. We invest in rebuilding our dilapidated water and sewer systems, our bridges, our railroads, our inner cities. We develop high-speed rail. We use science to find new ways to improve our lives through research and development. We change outdated laws that now keep many non-violent offenders in prison and we use community policing and community corrections to focus on genuine rehabilitation rather than prison warehousing. We get government out of citizens’ bedrooms by permitting marriage unions between same sex couples.

Which road should a Chicago grassroots organizer choose? A road to individual prosperity and full-employment or the same old road where the rich man plays while the little man pays? We can rebuild our infrastructure or watch it crumble as roving gangs go from neighborhood to neighborhood stealing whatever they can. We can rethink our priorities on taking care of ourselves as citizens or we can watch our prisons become the number one industry in the nation. We can develop new green transportation now or do nothing as gas prices skyrocket to $10 or more per gallon.

Strike three? Let’s be real before you swing at the next pitch. The United States is a mess and there are no easy solutions or quick fixes. This ain’t McDonald’s. Social and economic change takes time and a willingness to sacrifice now so that future generations will not have to. Rebuilding infrastructure takes time, perhaps even more than one generation. Can we accept a way of life in which we may not see the benefits in our lifetime? It takes time to convert from a “me” society that leads the world in the consumption of fossil fuels to a “we” society that has a low carbon footprint. Until we can produce millions of electric commuter cars, we may even have to ration gas at some point, making sure that fuel goes to farmers and distribution outlets before personal use in automobiles.

Many sacrifices, some of which are unpredictable now, must be made so that our grandchildren and great-grandchildren can live in a humane nation that prioritizes its needs and produces to meet those needs. If we fail to act soon, our children will be living in a fascist dictatorship where nothing is provided or guaranteed by government, including Social Security; where fuel is unavailable and food is not affordable for most people; where brown-outs and blackouts are commonplace as the electric grid fails from the lack of upkeep; where clean drinking water is unavailable because polluters have lobbied against regulations that impede their profit-taking; where few people can afford health insurance and those without the ability to pay up front are turned away by armed hospital guards. This is not science fiction. This is a glimpse at the future unless we, collectively, as citizens, demand of our leaders that we take a different road now.

Which road should a former grassroots organizer choose? The count is 0-2.

Americans have forgotten their own history. From the struggle of Native Americans to preserve their subsistence lifestyle and their harmony with the natural world to the fight of labor unions for an eight-hour workday, Americans have forgotten their own history of class struggle. The tragedy of this national memory loss is that citizens cannot make important decisions regarding the United States today without understanding the events that happened in the past.

This national memory loss is a failure of both the educational system and the mass media. The school administrators and teachers who decide which history textbooks to purchase and the editors and publishers who decide what is newsworthy emphasize certain historical trends and omit others. One could argue that it is not possible for the historians themselves — let alone educators and journalists — to be completely objective in their decisions and judgments, but we should expect and demand a more impartial, realistic treatment of American history.

NATIVE AMERICAN RESISTANCE TO AMERICAN EXPANSIONISM

When Christopher Columbus arrived in the Americas in 1492, millions of Native Americans were already living here. Columbus’s “discovery” opened the Americas to exploitation by the colonizing Europeans, who then proceeded to murder thousands of Native Americans while stealing their land and whatever other treasures they could find.

Native Americans were living in harmony with the Earth and they had a profound respect for all that the natural world — the Great Spirit — provided for them. As the United States was formed and the westward expansion began, those Indians who were not murdered were forced to live on smaller and smaller parcels of land, to give up their subsistence lifestyle, and to succumb to the demands of the United States Government. Surrender or starve.

In 1868, the Treaty of Fort Laramie was signed between the United States and the various tribes of the Sioux Nation. The treaty promised some 50 million square miles of land in what is now part of Nebraska, the Dakotas, Wyoming and Montana “as long as the grass shall grow.” The treaty stipulated that no changes could be made unless three-fourths of the adult males of the Sioux Nation approved the changes.

Shortly after the treaty was signed, gold was discovered in the Black Hills — the sacred “Paha Sapa” — and white settlers began moving into the area in violation of the treaty. The U.S. government sought to support the interests of the settlers by advocating the construction of new roads and railroads into the area in spite of opposition by the Sioux. This led to fierce battles as the Indians sought to hold onto the land granted to them under the 1868 treaty. After suffering embarrassing military defeats by Crazy Horse and Red Cloud, the United States advocated a policy of genocide against the Sioux and their main food supply, the buffalo. This policy began to take its toll on the Sioux and, in 1876, Red Cloud was forced to sign a document abrogating the 1868 treaty and turning the Black Hills over to the white man even though three-fourths of the adults males had not agreed to any alteration of the treaty. (To this day, the Sioux Nation considers the 1868 treaty a valid document.)

WOUNDED KNEE MASSACRE OF 1890

By 1890, the U.S. government was pursuing the Sioux bands still at large. “On December 29,” writes Peter Matthiessen, “when Big Foot and two hundred or more men, women, and children, with a few fugitives from Sitting Bull’s Hunkpapa band, were slaughtered by the Seventh Cavalry at Wounded Knee, Custer’s avenged regiment received twenty Congressional medals of honor from a grateful government, despite a bungled maneuver in which at least twenty-five Blue Coats perished in the cross fire from their own guns.” After the slaughter, the dead Indians were buried in a mass grave on the top of a small hill.

The Wounded Knee Massacre of 1890 is an important historical event, but it and similar atrocities against American Indians — including, even, the 1973 battle of Wounded Knee — have been forgotten by most people. A national memory loss.

Historian Howard Zinn writes:

“The chief problem in historical honesty is not outright lying. It is the omission or de-emphasis of important data. The definition of important, of course, depends on one’s values. An example is the Ludlow Massacre. I was in college studying history when I heard a song by folksinger Woody Guthrie called “The Ludlow Massacre,” a dark, intense ballad, accompanied by slow, haunting chords on his guitar. It told of women and children burned to death in a strike of miners against Rockefeller-owned coal mines in southern Colorado in 1914. My curiosity was aroused. In none of my classes in American history, in none of the textbooks I had read, was there any mention of the Ludlow Massacre or the Colorado coal strike. I decided to study the history of the labor movement on my own.”

What do the Wounded Knee Massacre and the Ludlow Massacre have in common? The answer is simple: The same state forces that wanted to end Indian resistance to the authority of the United States Government also wanted to end the resistance of the miners to the authority of Rockefeller and the coal bosses. Today, those who control education and the mass media prefer that students not learn the specifics of these events, as any impartial examination must portray the actions of the government and the coal bosses as criminal.

RULING CLASS VS. WORKING CLASS

It all has to do with state power — that is, the power of the Wall Street industrialists to maintain control over the economy, keep people divided and fighting amongst themselves over petty issues, and maintain political stability so they can keep increasing their profits. There are two separate classes of people in the United States today: the ruling class — the multi-millionaires and billionaires who own the factories, mines, mills, corporate farms, utilities, airlines, railroads, hospitals, media outlets, and so forth; and the working class — the white and blue collar workers, the 90 percent of us who work at these places, or who, for whatever reason, are unemployed or in prison. (The mass media rarely mention any class except the “middle class,” yet they never explain what they mean or who, precisely, is included in this class. They do not acknowledge a ruling class or a working class.)

It is precisely because of class distinctions that many labor uprisings — including demonstrations, riots and strikes — have occurred in the United States. Such uprisings, if they are allowed to continue and spread, would be a direct threat to political stability, a threat to the authority and profit-taking of the ruling class, so such struggles are squelched as quickly as possible and then are rarely mentioned again. The greatest fear of the ruling class is that the working class will organize itself and seize state power and corporate profit, so the rulers try to keep the working class divided and afraid. It’s white vs. black, young vs. old, professionals vs. laborers, conservative vs. liberal, liberal vs. progressive, men vs. women, straight vs. gay, urban vs. rural, resident vs. immigrant, pro-abortion vs. anti-abortion, and so on.

The educational system and the mass media routinely omit historical events that show the working class organizing itself against the ruling class and the 19th century struggle for an eight-hour workday is a good example here.

HAYMARKET SQUARE MASSACRE

After the stock market crash of 1873, hundreds of thousands of people were thrown out of work and many were unable to secure even the basic necessities of life. Those lucky enough to still have jobs often had to accept wage cuts of up to 50 percent. This led to mass meetings, strikes, hunger marches, and demonstrations of unemployed workers. It also led to a nationwide movement demanding a shorter, eight-hour workday to spread around the available work. In 1877, a series of railroad strikes protesting wage reductions and long hours became a full-blown labor uprising in some cities and U.S. troops were deployed to crush the strikers. More than 100 workers were killed, hundreds were wounded, and thousands were arrested.

On May 1, 1886, at the height of the movement for the eight-hour workday, some 65,000 workers in Chicago walked off the job. Police and Pinkerton detectives (thugs hired by companies to spy, disrupt and kill) began to use clubs to break up peaceful mass rallies and, on May 3, they opened fire on a crowd of lumber-shavers, killing four and wounding many.

On May 4, after a peaceful rally at Chicago’s Haymarket Square, someone threw a bomb into a crowd of policemen, killing seven and wounding 66. The police then opened fire on the strikers. After mass media reports condemned the bombing, but did not condemn the police and Pinkerton violence, many strike leaders were hanged, jailed or blacklisted. No one ever found out who threw the bomb.

A national memory loss. American youth are growing up with no knowledge of these events because they are rarely taught in history classes. Even on Labor Day, which American workers celebrate each September, the mass media do not run stories on the struggle for the eight-hour workday; instead their stories focus on Labor Day parades, picnics in the park, and other activities related to the last three-day weekend of summer.

The ruling class have robbed us of our past so they can control our future. Again, while there are no secret meetings to decide which historical events should be omitted, there has been a consensus among school administrators and among media executives about what to emphasize — such as the business sector, the economy, and economic growth — and what to de-emphasize or omit — such as labor struggles and movements within the United States for independence, sovereignty and human rights. Although the issues of the labor movement are of interest to many people, there are no labor shows on network television and no labor sections of daily newspapers. The only time labor is covered at all is when there is a strike of national significance such as the 1997 Teamsters strike against United Parcel Service — a strike which was won by public support for the strikers in spite of mass media attempts to portray the strikers as greedy villains.

How can we possibly understand our present economic crisis and proposed solutions without having knowledge of the past? Americans have the power to confront representatives of the educational system and the mass media. We can form student groups to demand the use of history textbooks that are more consistent with reality. We can stage community teach-ins at school board meetings and other public events to educate people about missing historical information. We can write articles for school papers and letters to the editor of local newspapers. Good or bad, right or wrong, American history belongs to all Americans and we must reclaim it.

Acknowledgments

Matthiessen, Peter, In The Spirit of Crazy Horse, (New York: Penguin Books, 1992), p. 20.

Yellen, Samuel, America’s Labor Struggles, (New York: Nomad Press, 1980), pp. 50-58.

Zinn, Howard, Declarations of Independence, (New York: HarperCollins, 1990), p. 51.

As oil wars and global warming threaten to propel our small
world and its inhabitants into an epoch of utter chaos, we Americans
must decide which side we want to be on. Do we continue to support
the status quo warmongers in our government as they pursue their
farcical “war on terrorism” or do we build a bold new
foreign policy based on generosity, mutual cooperation, social
and economic justice, respect for human rights and the pursuit of peace?

The 9/11 terrorist attacks left many of us feeling confused
and uneasy about what is in store for us. Our politicians offer
nothing but grim predicitons of long-term conventional wars –
and possibly even nuclear wars — as we seek to control the world’s
ever-shrinking oil reserves by forcing oil producing nations into
submission to Big Oil. All of this, of course, is foisted upon
us under the guise of fighting supposed “terrorists,”"insurgents,”
“rebels,” “militants,” “guerrillas,” “gunmen,” “militiamen,”
– or whatever other convenient media labels are chosen for those
who dare to oppose U.S. imperialism.

Outside of university areas, there are few public discussions
regarding these matters of urgent importance. The mass media do
not aid public discourse; rather, they hinder it by talking down
to us and telling us what to think. They hinder discourse by failing
to provide factual background information, by omitting key points,
and then by diverting our attention away from political news to
sports, prime-time entertainment and advertising. We are treated
like dumb sheep, herded from pen to pen at the will of the status
quo politicians and their mass media.

As part of so-called “war on terrorism,” former President
Bush has launched all-out, neo-conservative assault on the rights
and freedoms guaranteed under the U.S. Constitution. Although
many court battles can be expected during the Obama administration,
President Bush claimed the right to round up American citizens deemed
“illegal combatants” and to interrogate and detain them without due process.
Foreign nationals who are arrested in the war on terrorism have no
constitutional protections whatsoever and may be secretly locked up,
subjected to psychological torture, and denied access to legal counsel and
telephones — all without any charges being filed against them.

Under the USA Patriot Act, passed by Congress with little discussion
or dissension and signed into law by President Bush, federal agencies
(i.e., Big Brother) can listen in on your private telephone conversations
and read your email without telling you or charging you with any
crime. Libraries, too, are required by law to disclose to
federal agencies the titles of books you have been reading.
These are just some of the reactionary, unconstitutional measures
adopted after 9/11 — not to make us any safer from terrorists
– but to spy on us in case we would decide to organize our efforts
into a political movement capable of challenging our corporate-driven
government. It seems that our government is not afraid of the
terrorists; it is afraid of us.

As today’s youth, it is your responsibility to take the lead
in the fight to preserve and expand Democracy 2.0. You can do this
by educating yourself, by focusing your efforts on specific issues
of social justice and environmental responsibility. Form after-school
political groups; write articles for your student newspaper; build
a web site; use social media; demand that the government live-stream
all panels, committees and hearings; organize community teach-ins,
marches and antiwar demonstrations; discuss democratic issues such
as the need for open debates as a vital part of public discourse; practice
non-violent civil disobedience; educate your parents (who may have already
succumbed to media-driven fear-mongering).

Act decisively and proactively — don’t simply react to others
Your future depends on it and our planet depends on you.

Education has long been an issue in presidential elections
even though the burden of school funding has largely been placed
upon individual communities and states. Nevertheless, in campaign
2000, the Republicans said the Democrats were responsible for
the education “recession” and the Democrats fired back
that the Republicans were responsible for the education “depression.”

Both parties talked about “issues” such as hiring quality
teachers, student testing, school accountability, vouchers, tax
credits and school choice. Give me a break! Such empty rhetoric
merely treats education as a free market commodity and offers
no specific solutions for ensuring a quality public education
for our children. If schools are run by private companies — instead
of being governed on behalf of the public good — then the private
companies can limit access and charge high prices. This is already
happening in higher education.

Perhaps we, as a society — and certainly the Democratic and
Republican politicians — have forgotten what a public education
is supposed to be, so we have to ask: What is the purpose of education?

Well, first, education should prepare us for citizenship so that
we may become active, free-thinking participants in the decision-making
process of our government and be able to make informed, reasoned
choices as social advocates and as voters. Second, education should
prepare us for the real world of life after high school as we
seek jobs, begin careers, open bank accounts, have children of
our own, purchase homes, or go on to college.

We must begin the collective search for a new paradigm in education.
Most of us will agree that the coursework needed to fulfill the purpose
of education should focus first on the basics, including math, reading,
writing, science and humanities, but these subjects alone do not fulfill
the purpose of education. But we also need practical courses that
teach us how to survive in the real world. I can hear the politicians
screaming already, but the following subjects should somehow become
a part of every school curriculum. In my experiences, these are
what I see missing most in myself and in others I have observed.

Relationships, self-esteem and conflict resolution

These subjects, perhaps combined into a single course, should
be required in grammar school, junior high and high school. Students
will learn how to feel good about themselves, how to develop healthy
friendships, how to handle intimacy, how to handle bullies, and
how to disagree and resolve conflicts with each other peacefully.
There is entirely too much arguing and fighting in the hallways.

Nutrition and preventative medicine

At least one course on this subject should be required in high
school. Students will learn what foods and combinations of foods
are necessary to provide adequate nutrition and promote good health.
The focus of this course will be on how to eat right, prepare
food safely, and maintain good health so that the student will
make fewer trips to the health care facilities later in life.
Vegetarianism and the controversy over the use of dietary supplements
will also be discussed in this course. Students will also learn
some basic first aid and medical assessment skills.

Parenting

One high school course on this subject should be required.
In today’s world, one needs a certificate, a license, a degree,
or at least some formal training, to do just about anything, but
anyone can be a parent without any preparation or guidance
whatsoever. This class will teach basic parenting skills and will
includecaring for newborns, early childhood development,
discipline, setting limits, allowing choices, communicating
parental expectations and consequences, and consistent
follow-through.

Values and ethics

One high school course on this subject should be required.
Concepts of right and wrong vary greatly from one culture to another
and from one religion to another. The differences and similarities
between these belief and value systems, as well as moral dilemmas,
will be discussed openly and honestly so that all students understand
healthy value systems. The intention of this course is not to
indoctrinate students into a particular value system, such as
Christianity, but this course will teach and discuss the range
of value systems that exist in today’s world. A student who learns
only one value system in the home will not be prepared for encounters
with other cultures and, thus, will not be prepared to make informed
decisions later in life.

Home finance and budgeting

While advanced math classes such as algebra and geometry are
often required courses, students can graduate from high school
without knowing how to set up a simple household budget and balance
a checkbook. This course will fill that void and will also discuss
banking, personal loans and credit so that students know what
to expect after graduation and can avoid getting into trouble
with credit cards.

Historical causation

Current history and government classes often focus on memorizing
the dates of historical events and the names of key participants,
but they fail to provide students an understanding of the historical
context in which those events occurred. Every human event, every
war, every revolution, every social upheaval, every labor strike,
has a traceable cause — a series of events leading up to it.

This course will teach students how to trace this causation analytically
so that they may better understand how previous events have shaped
our world into what it is today and how today’s events are shaping
tomorrow’s world. If only one history class is required in school,
this should be it.

After-school programs

As part of this new model for education, I propose that school
systems invest in after-school community centers. These centers,
open Sunday through Thursday from 3 p.m. until 10 p.m. and on
Friday and Saturday from 5 p.m. until 1:00 a.m., would provide
a safe, positive place for students to gather. There would be
a quiet study room, with teachers or tutors available throughout
the evening to assist students with problems. There would also
be a computer room for internet research, a gaming room offering
video games, pool tables, cards and chess, and a large social
room for weekend dances and live music. Soft drinks, juices, and
a light menu would be available. There might even be a low power
radio station — with a range of about one mile — so students
can play CDs, learn about broadcasting, and provide local news
and opinion to the community. The center might also publish a
small monthly newsletter to keep the community informed about
scheduled events and happenings.

____________

If we really want to fix the public school system in the United
States and give our children the best education in the world,
then we will need to reduce class sizes, hire more teachers and
counselors, and restore federal funding to public schools. Making
communities and states responsible for school funding was a political
ploy in the name of reducing so-called “entitlement”
spending by what was referred to as “big government,”
but the reality is that the money is still being spent, but not
on education or social programs. Rather, it is being spent on
corporate welfare and the military. There’s the rub. Do we want
the best schools in the world or do we want to continue creating
the best weapons of mass destruction in the world? We can’t have
it both ways. I cast my vote for cutting the military budget and
for restoring federal funding to our public school system.